I really appreciate it when tech companies make an effort to preserve history and share it.
However, it's important to also share Nintendo has recently launched a major campaign of unprecedented legal attacks on the historical preservation, retro emulation and fan creation communities. While Nintendo has always been protective of its IP rights, this was largely limited to stopping piracy of current titles and protecting their trademarks from commercial infringement, both of which are appropriate and understandable.
However, the greatly expanded and all-encompassing scope of their recent legal actions now threatens aspects of non-profit historical preservation and adjacent fan activities unrelated to Nintendo's present day commercial interests. Previously, Nintendo's lawyers made at least some effort to distinguish between non-profit or fan hobby activities and piracy or commercial trademark abuse. Their senior management also seemed to appreciate the retro community is some their most active current customers and brand fans. Over the last year that restraint has vanished, making it all the more ironic Nintendo is now funding a new museum to celebrate its past while funding lawyers to threaten the non-profit historical preservation and non-commercial fan communities passionately keeping Nintendo's storied past alive for future generations.
While I'll always love Nintendo's rich historical legacy, until they again exercise reasonable restraint in their now-abusive legal tactics, I can no longer in good conscience support the company or its products.
However, it's important to also share Nintendo has recently launched a major campaign of unprecedented legal attacks on the historical preservation, retro emulation and fan creation communities. While Nintendo has always been protective of its IP rights, this was largely limited to stopping piracy of current titles and protecting their trademarks from commercial infringement, both of which are appropriate and understandable.
However, the greatly expanded and all-encompassing scope of their recent legal actions now threatens aspects of non-profit historical preservation and adjacent fan activities unrelated to Nintendo's present day commercial interests. Previously, Nintendo's lawyers made at least some effort to distinguish between non-profit or fan hobby activities and piracy or commercial trademark abuse. Their senior management also seemed to appreciate the retro community is some their most active current customers and brand fans. Over the last year that restraint has vanished, making it all the more ironic Nintendo is now funding a new museum to celebrate its past while funding lawyers to threaten the non-profit historical preservation and non-commercial fan communities passionately keeping Nintendo's storied past alive for future generations.
While I'll always love Nintendo's rich historical legacy, until they again exercise reasonable restraint in their now-abusive legal tactics, I can no longer in good conscience support the company or its products.